3 ms·
and easier to learn. and better funded. and easier to find devs.
by hu3 10mo ago
and easier to learn.
and better funded.
and easier to find devs.
- ramon156 10mo agoThey both suck getting new devs for Also, just because it's part of Google doesn't make go better funded. Theyd probably be fine killing go. Definitely easier to learn though :P
- FieryMechanic 10mo agoGo been around for quite a while now. It isn't going anywhere.
- vablings 10mo agoRust has been around for over 10 years now. In the last five years the language hasn't changed much and has gotten better and better
- FieryMechanic 10mo agoI didn't like Rust one bit and gave up learning it. Go on the other hand is quite nice.
- hu3 10mo ago> They both suck getting new devs for I'm willing to be Rust suck a ton more to hire devs. Since, as we both agree, Go is easy to learn. Any C#, PHP or Java dev can get going with Go in not time.
- agumonkey 10mo agoi have no dog in the fight, but based on tor release schedule it seems to me that the team is very very talented and rust complexity is not a challenge for them
- tjpnz 10mo agoRust is going to feel more familiar to Tor contributors than Go. Based on the list of platinum members (which includes Google and Tor btw) there's some serious money going into the Rust Foundation, assuming it's managed properly I can't see funding as an issue. https://rustfoundation.org/members/ https://rustfoundation.org/members/