In your example, virtually everybody died, even with fire arms. So I still wonder against what / who you are really defending. Needing a seat belt is much mor

In your example, virtually everybody died, even with fire arms. So I still wonder against what / who you are really defending. Needing a seat belt is much more likely than needing a fire arms, at least in Europe. Focusing on fire arms means focusing on the wrog things. It's about a feeling of security, not actual security. To use your wording: You'd give the world to have focussed on something else instead of buying a fire arm.