2 ms·
I wonder why SiFive wasn't the acquisition target
by boredatoms 10mo ago
I wonder why SiFive wasn't the acquisition target
- ch_123 10mo agoMight be worth more than Qualcomm is willing to spend and/or introduce antitrust concerns. This feels like a hedging of bets, no need for Qualcomm to buy the biggest name in the RISC-V space.
- rwmj 10mo agoSiFive have apparently been shopping themselves around for a while. But they've been around for a long time, taken loads of investment, had a huge number of employees at one point (not now), and don't have very competitive products. My speculation is they're just not a very attractive acquisition with a complex ownership structure, and are demanding too much money to compensate their earlier investors.
- tonetegeatinst 10mo agoDoes anyone know or have they leaked potential cost of acquisition?
- monocasa 10mo agoThe $2B deal with Intel fell through. Thought they were arguably worth more on paper then. My guess is that they're in a weird place where a fair offer at the moment is less than the investment they've gotten so far.
- deleted 10mo ago[deleted]
- phendrenad2 10mo agoNote that the $2 billion deal story was always "according to people with knowledge of the matter", and I wonder if it was nothing more than Intel taking a peek at Sifive's technology and books. https://archive.is/FVMLI#selection-3331.81-3331.129 https://archive.is/FVMLI#selection-3331.81-3331.129
- pieter3d 10mo agoA perfect target for Intel then, followed by a rapid exodus of the employees and destruction of the IP (like every other Intel acquisition).
- monocasa 10mo agoThey almost got bought by Intel, but then even Intel noped out. https://www.tomshardware.com/news/intel-failed-to-buy-sifive https://www.tomshardware.com/news/intel-failed-to-buy-sifive
- IshKebab 10mo agoSiFive have had a very long time to create competitive CPUs and they haven't really managed it. I dunno what's going on there but I'm not sure I'd buy them either.
- snvzz 10mo agoTheir P870-D looks plenty competitive. What they might have issues with is finding clients to license it to.