4 ms·
The main reason is the better alternative costs twice as much.
by dmix 11mo ago
The main reason is the better alternative costs twice as much.
- voakbasda 11mo agoWow. I didn’t know Linux cost that much! /s
- bluGill 11mo agoCost isn't only money. In the case of linux it is time to learn to use it (which is a sunk cost on windows: already paid it). Then you need to download and install it - again windows comes by default so a sunk cost.
- ErroneousBosh 11mo ago> In the case of linux it is time to learn to use it How much time do you need to take to learn "click on the swirly orange thing for Internet"? It looks just the same as it does in every other OS. > (which is a sunk cost on windows: already paid it) This is actually something I'm coping with at the moment, because I have to learn how to use Windows and it's the most backwards thing ever to use.
- bluGill 11mo agoIf somebody else admins your system. However if not there is a lot to learn. At least every distribution I've used needs manual updates from time to time. (though admittedly most people would replace the computer before I've seen anything hard happen)
- ErroneousBosh 11mo agoWhy would it need someone else to "admin" it? Who currently "admins" your Windows system?