4 ms·
> 15-20% of the world is estimated to have a disability. Not a chance in hell.
by pelorat 11mo ago
> 15-20% of the world is estimated to have a disability.
Not a chance in hell.
- IshKebab 11mo agoWell... in the UK it's now around 25%: https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cbp-9602/ https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cbp-... However, big caveat - it's self-reported. If you look at how many people get disability benefit it's around 10%. So whether or not that is true depends entirely on what you mean by "disability" which is obviously not a well defined term.
- toast0 11mo ago> However, big caveat - it's self-reported. If you look at how many people get disability benefit it's around 10%. I don't know about the UK, but in the US, in order to get social security disability, you need to have a documented disability and there's also income limits. If you have a disability, but you manage to find a career despite the disability, you'll lose eligibility for social security disability or at least you'll lose the social security payments. Depending on the disabilities in question, I think it's reasonable that 60% of people with a disability can find work that pays enough that they are no longer eligible for a disability payment and/or they've reached the age where they get a retirement/old age insurance benefit rather than disability.
- powerclue 11mo agoIf you have better data, I'm sure the world would love to have it. The world, however, seems to agree the number is somewhere around 15-20%. World Health Organization: 16% https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/disability-and-health https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/disability-... UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs: 15% https://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/resources/factsheet-on-persons-with-disabilities.html https://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/resources/f... CDC: 25% of Americans https://www.cdc.gov/disability-and-health/articles-documents/disability-impacts-all-of-us-infographic.html https://www.cdc.gov/disability-and-health/articles-documents... ROD Group: 22% https://www.rod-group.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/The-Global-Economics-of-Disability-2024-The-Return-on-Disability-Group-September-24-2024.pdf?https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rod-group.com%2Fresearch-insights%2Fannual-report-2024%2F https://www.rod-group.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/The-Glo...
- Aloisius 11mo agoUS Census Department: 8.3% of 18-34 year olds https://www.census.gov/library/visualizations/2024/comm/disability-status-age-group.html https://www.census.gov/library/visualizations/2024/comm/disa...
- missedthecue 11mo agoEasily wayyy more than that given both the loosening standards of what a disability is combined with over-diagnosis. But I get your sentiment. When I was a kid, disabled meant you were in a wheelchair or needed someone to physically feed you, and now it means you have an Adderall prescription.
- powerclue 11mo agoSounds like the old definition was missing a lot of people with disabilities.
- Panzer04 11mo agoPeople have different ideas of what "disabled" means. Broadening the definition makes it less useful in many ways. I would consider "disabled" to mean one of: - Unable to ambulate effectively (requires crutches or worse) - Unable to look after oneself as an adult (for any combination of reasons) - Unable to use tools and items most people would consider standard - eg. can't hold a pencil, write, type, whatever. That's a fairly harsh definition of disabled, but all of these people unambiguously require accommodation because of their incapacity. It's also off the top of my head, so I'd happily broaden it if you want to argue the point. If I can talk to someone for an entire day and not realise or notice they are disabled in some way, I question the definition being used - how helpful is it in deciding how we should allocate additional resources and help in that case?