4 ms·
No need for UPS, a good external usb soundcard with power supply will solve that problem. I have all connected to the the same power circuit and with a Elektro
by Yeask 10mo ago
No need for UPS, a good external usb soundcard with power supply will solve that problem.
I have all connected to the the same power circuit and with a Elektron Digitakt as audio device and have zero noise.
With audio devices powered by USB there is a lot of noise.
- blep-arsh 10mo agoI also have a splitter which lets you power an USB device from a separate power supply (i.e. D+/D- lines are connected to a host and +5V comes from a separate plug, ground is shared though). And optical TOSLINK is a nice option where available.
- Night_Thastus 10mo agoSigh, it's almost like I had this conversation before. My audio equipment is not connected by USB. It's connected by optical (TOSLINK) to an external DAC. TOSLINK is not great, but it shows that it is not a USB noise problem.
- Yeask 10mo agoIf you had that conversation before and you still having noise, maybe you are not doing the right thing... Sigh...
- Night_Thastus 10mo agoI got rid of the noise via the method I described in the original comment? Moving my audio equipment to separate power strip on a separate outlet. It didn't totally remove it, but made it quiet enough to deal with.
- butvacuum 10mo agoDon't mind them. I've had a similar thing happen, but with power line Ethernet. In your case however, I'd be at least a little concerned about the building wiring.
- Night_Thastus 10mo agoI ran into a similar problem! I briefly used CAT6, which is required to be shielded. That shielding was carrying noise from my PC, through the network switch, to my raspberry pi that I used for music streaming. Absolutely nuts. I swapped to unshielded ethernet cables and it went away. As for building wiring, this issue has persisted in multiple buildings.
- hunter2_ 10mo agoIn many analog pro audio applications, it's actually recommended that a shield be connected at one side only, for this reason. By convention but not necessarily necessity, the bond is typically kept at the receiving end, as that's almost always a device with a grounded power cord (such as a mixer). Many DI boxes feature a ground lift switch as a convenient way to achieve this. But you wouldn't want to disconnect it at both ends, as then the shield has no effect at all. Anyway, if you had problems with your unshielded cables that would be solved by a shield, but your shielded cables caused a different problem due to the bond at both ends, this technique of using shielded cables but severing the shield at one end of them would get you the best of both worlds.
- typewithrhythm 10mo agoHuh, I had no idea that cables would have their shield grounded at both ends... Single point ground is such a standard in electrical design that the guidance is generally "do otherwise only if you have the ability to make many prototypes to nail RFI issues".
- crote 10mo agoIt's a high-speed vs low-speed thing. If you're building an audio cable your signal will peak out at a few kHz, so the cable acting as an antenna and picking up a signal in the MHz range isn't an issue. Similarly, you're not transmitting anything significant either. But a ground loop can easily ruin your day. If you're building a cable for multi-gbps data transmission, that ground loop noise might as well not exist - it's basically DC. But ground your shielding at only one end, and suddenly you're ruining everyone's wifi! Building a device which needs high-speed data on one side, and analog audio on the other side? Good luck...
- deleted 10mo ago[deleted]
- nopurpose 10mo agoI got a lot of noise when plugging speakers to my display :(