3 ms·
Sure, and then you can throw another LLM in and make them come to a consensus, of course that could be wrong too so have another three do the same and then comp
by phatskat 10mo ago
Sure, and then you can throw another LLM in and make them come to a consensus, of course that could be wrong too so have another three do the same and then compare, and then…
- bsenftner 10mo agoI have an ongoing and endless debate with a PhD that insists consensus of multiple LLMs is a valid proof check. The guy is a neuroscientist, not at all a developer tech head, and is just stubborn, continually projecting a sentient being perspective on his LLM usage.
- mikkupikku 10mo agoThis, but unironically. It's not much different from the way human unreliability is accounted for. Add more until you're satisfied a suitable ratio of mistakes will be caught.
- SoftTalker 10mo agoOr maybe it will be a circle of LLMs all coming up with different responses and all telling each other "You're absolutely right!"