3 ms·
Lets assume that .1% is cumulative, but so is the effect from agriculture which is 99.9%. Agriculture would affect the person 1000x than the data centre (if you
by simianwords 11mo ago
Lets assume that .1% is cumulative, but so is the effect from agriculture which is 99.9%. Agriculture would affect the person 1000x than the data centre (if you accept the .1% figure). This sounds ridiculous so it is necessary to put it in concrete terms.
- b3lvedere 11mo agoOf course. The issue could be that the previous parties combined "successfully" could uphold the legal limit, but now that suddenly the data centers also participate it's above the limit. Who's to blame? Tricky legal question. My personal opinion is everybody involved should take their percentage of the blame, but i doubt they're willing to pay or act upon it.
- monerozcash 11mo ago> Who's to blame? Tricky legal question The polluters. Datacenters didn't put the pollutants in the water. Datacenters used water, but as their process does not use the pollutants the concentration of pollutants in water increased very slightly.