4 ms·

IIRC, it's also why the leap day was set to Feb 29th in the first place. At the time (romans?) the year started March 1st. In case someone was wondering why in

• amenghra 11mo ago
  And (oct)ober was the 8th month of the year, (nov)ember the ninth, (dec)ember the tenth!
  • Izikiel43 11mo ago
    Don't forget (sep)tember being the 7th month
  • sltkr 11mo ago
    Weird parenthesization. The latin numbers are septem, octo, novem, decem for 7, 8, 9, 10. And then they all have a -ber suffix.
    • amenghra 11mo ago
      The three letter prefixes show up in English (eg oct in octal, dec in decimal, etc.).
      • thaumasiotes 11mo ago
        The prefix in "decimal" is "decim", like you'd expect given that the root is "decem". There is no "dec-" prefix. (You do see "deca" used as a prefix, "a" included, but that doesn't come from Latin.)
        • amenghra 11mo ago
          You are right. I should have written: (septem)ber was the 7th month of the year, (octo)ber was the 8th, (novem)ber the ninth, and (decem)ber the tenth!
• variaga 11mo ago
  That's correct, the Romans had March as the first month of the year, so leap day was the last day of the year and September, October, November and December were the 7th (sept), 8th (oct), ninth (nov) and 10th (dec) months.
  • ljsprague 11mo ago
    June and July used to be Quintilis and Sextilis.
    • quesera 11mo ago
      I think Quintilis and Sextilis were renamed to July and August, in honor of Julius and Augustus, respectively.
• jcranmer 11mo ago
  The calendar was regularized to include a leap day during the reign of Julius Caesar (hence the name "Julian calendar"), which would have been 45 BC. The Roman calendar moved to January as the first month of the year in 153 BC, over a hundred years before the leap day was added. The 10-month calendar may not have even existed--we see no contemporary evidence of its existence, only reports of its existence from centuries hence and the change there is attributed to a mythical character.
  • anyfoo 11mo ago
    Are you saying that while we do see evidence that September, October, November, December were once the 7th, 8th, 9th, and 10th month, we don't see any evidence that the calendar was ever "10 months long"? (How would that have worked anyway, did they have more days per month?)
    • jcranmer 11mo ago
      Pretty much. > How would that have worked anyway, did they have more days per month? The way I've heard, they just simply didn't track the date during the winter.
  • pbhjpbhj 11mo ago
    Wikipedia gives 3 dates for January being the first month, either (approx) 700, 450, 150 BCE. It's fair to say January was the first month of the Roman calendar; despite it having formerly been March.
  • eru 11mo ago
    Btw, the Romans had leap days before Julius Caesar, but they were added ad hoc by the Pontifex Maximus. Caesar happened to be the Pontifex Maximus (an office you hold for life once elected to), but he wasn't in Rome much to do that job. So after he came back from hanging out with Cleopatra in Egypt he came back and set the calendar on auto-pilot.
  • avadodin 11mo ago
    I don't know if it ever made it to production, and I don't remember exactly why it made sense at the time, but one early hack I did was passing a date in Julian format because there weren't enough bits to pass a full timestamp.
• deleted 11mo ago
  [deleted]
• wizzwizz4 11mo ago
  Technically, the leap day (bissextus) was the 24th. (Wikipedia tells me this is because that's when Mercedonius used to be, before the Julian reforms.)