3 ms·

There’s no way that wasn’t specifically prompted.

• bugglebeetle 1y ago
  To be fair, it could’ve been post-trained into the model as well…
• dialup_sounds 1y ago
  Having seen Musk fandom, every unhinged Grok claim has a good chance of having actually been written by a human somewhere in its training data.
• dmix 1y ago
  The system prompt for Grok on Twitter is open source AFAIK. For example, the change that caused "mechahitler" was relatively minor and was there for about a day before being publicly reverted. https://github.com/xai-org/grok-prompts/commit/c5de4a14feb50b0e5b3e8554f9c8aae8c97b56b4 https://github.com/xai-org/grok-prompts/commit/c5de4a14feb50...
  • orbital-decay 1y ago
    That doesn't mean there are no private injections. Which is not uncommon, for example claude.ai system prompts are public, but Claude also has hidden dynamic prompt injections, and a ton of other semi-black box machinery surrounding the model.
  • Topfi 1y ago
    Sorry, but can you point me to what part of the system prompt here would/could be responsible for causing MechaHitler? I have yet to see anything in the prompt they claim to have been using that would lead to such output from models by Google, OpenAI or Anthropic.