3 ms·

There are other unpopular opinions 1. It is difficult to believe that the deadly radioactivity was just blown away. Where was it blown to? Upwards to space?

• marcosdumay 11mo ago
  You seem to not be operating in good faith, but that one is interesting: > Then perhaps a larger amount of TNT You can replicate something on the size of the WWII bombs with TNT, but you can't get anything much larger. A TNT explosion is relatively slow, and if you blow too much of it, it will disperse before blowing.
  • ls-a 11mo ago
    Or other types of explosives that mushroom with lights and colors. We've seen real life examples of those. I'm just trying to have a controversial discussion while following HN rules and vibes. No politics, just facts. I didn't provide references hoping some curious mind would go searching for the truth themselves. Compelling evidence is out there. For example - Tokyo was carpet/fire bombed at the same time. Image comparisons between Tokyo and Hiroshima/Nagasaki destructions are extremely identical - Both Nagasaki and Hiroshima are harbor cities, which explains implanting the large amounts of TNT. (this tactic happened several times in recent history and is documented). This is actually the opinion of an American army member from when the alleged bombing happened. Good luck finding the video.
    • marcosdumay 11mo ago
      > No politics, just facts. Not a lot of facts, as most of your comment is trivial to disprove. > Image comparisons between Tokyo and Hiroshima/Nagasaki destructions are extremely identical The destruction in Tokyo is completely different from Hiroshima/Nagasaki. It's not centralized, and there's no mark of the extreme high temperatures the nuclear weapons create. > Both Nagasaki and Hiroshima are harbor cities, which explains implanting the large amounts of TNT. The place where the explosions happened is completely clear from the remains you can find there today. You can just get some satellite images and look. You are clearly going for a "wake up sheep!" comment, so go and wake up.
      • ls-a 11mo ago
        I'm open to discussion. If I see compelling evidence I could change my mind. Unfortunately I don't believe there is anything called "nuclear weapons". Just nuclear energy. Anyway that's old news. The new race is AI. Soon there is going to be a major event claiming to be AI superiority that will seem like magic. If that happens, I hope you remember my comment.
        • zamadatix 10mo ago
          You believe we sustain controlled nuclear energy near cities but needed to falsfify runaway reactions in the desert?
• tgsovlerkhgsel 10mo ago
  I've seen a lot of conspiracy theories but nuke denialism is a new one. Do you think the US is faking it and the rest of the nuclear nations developed nukes, or the US was faking it but no longer is, or everyone is in on the conspiracy? The answer to 1 is the always-popular "dilution is the solution to pollution", although that's not good enough for all cases, see the concept of "low-background steel". I also don't think fire bombing and carpet bombing could explain the very nuke-specific effects observed in Japan. Remember, not everyone in the targeted cities and surrounding areas died, and to the survivors, a carpet/fire bombing is quite obviously different from a nuke. Faking it with 10000 tons of TNT (or "perhaps a larger amount") is kind of hard (unless you want to claim that the Japanese were in on it) when the largest heavy-lift aircraft (An-225) had a max takeoff weight (not payload) of 630 tons and was built decades later.
  • ls-a 10mo ago
    It's not new. Like I said the U.S. army exposed it back when it happened. Don't worry about "nuclear bombs". I advise you to worry about Volcanoes. Did you know they are more frequent now. Did you know a volcano is stronger than many "atomic bombs" combined. Seek knowledge from the only Mighty God, before it's too late. Stop turning a deaf ear. That's my advice.