4 ms·

I don't suppose you saw the post where OP asked claude to explain why this patch was not plagiarized? It's pretty damning.

lambda_foo 11mo ago
Why have the OP in the loop at all if he’s just sending prompts to AI? Surely it’s a wonderful piece of performance art.
- footy 11mo ago
  it reads like humiliation fetish material honestly. I'd delete my account but he just doubles down.
  - pluc 11mo ago
    He's doing it elsewhere too: https://github.com/rerun-io/rerun/pull/11900#issuecomment-3563604774 https://github.com/rerun-io/rerun/pull/11900#issuecomment-35... https://github.com/ocaml/dune/issues/12731 https://github.com/ocaml/dune/issues/12731 https://github.com/tshort/StaticCompiler.jl/pull/180 https://github.com/tshort/StaticCompiler.jl/pull/180 Seems he's just on a rampage of "fixing" issues for trendy packages to get some attention.
    - footy 11mo ago
      > I like a tough challenge and I was hoping to attract your attention. thanks for the comedy material.
    - joelreymont 11mo ago
      I had $1000 in Claude credits to spend for the greater good.
      - pluc 11mo ago
        You didn't
      - snickerbockers 11mo ago
        Personally I would have those credits to generate hentai but to each his own i suppose. In the post where you had it respond to accusations of plagiarism and it responded by posting snippets of code which were obviously plagiarized and confidently asserted that they were not, what was your prompt? I ask because I felt its response was oddly tone-deaf even by LLM standards. I'm guessing that instead of giving it a neutral prompt such as "respond to this comment" you gave it something more specific such as "defend yourself against these accusations"? I'm used to seeing them contradict themselves and say things that are obviously not true but usually when confronted they will give in and admit their mistake rather than dig a deeper hole.
orwin 11mo ago
I think that's probably the most beautiful AI-generated post that was ever generated. The fact that he posted it shows that either he didn't read it, didn't understood it, or thought it would be fun to show how the AI implementation was inferior to the one it was 'inspired' from.

lambda_foo 11mo ago

Why have the OP in the loop at all if he’s just sending prompts to AI? Surely it’s a wonderful piece of performance art.

footy 11mo ago
it reads like humiliation fetish material honestly. I'd delete my account but he just doubles down.
- pluc 11mo ago
  He's doing it elsewhere too: https://github.com/rerun-io/rerun/pull/11900#issuecomment-3563604774 https://github.com/rerun-io/rerun/pull/11900#issuecomment-35... https://github.com/ocaml/dune/issues/12731 https://github.com/ocaml/dune/issues/12731 https://github.com/tshort/StaticCompiler.jl/pull/180 https://github.com/tshort/StaticCompiler.jl/pull/180 Seems he's just on a rampage of "fixing" issues for trendy packages to get some attention.
  - footy 11mo ago
    > I like a tough challenge and I was hoping to attract your attention. thanks for the comedy material.
  - joelreymont 11mo ago
    I had $1000 in Claude credits to spend for the greater good.
    - pluc 11mo ago
      You didn't
    - snickerbockers 11mo ago
      Personally I would have those credits to generate hentai but to each his own i suppose. In the post where you had it respond to accusations of plagiarism and it responded by posting snippets of code which were obviously plagiarized and confidently asserted that they were not, what was your prompt? I ask because I felt its response was oddly tone-deaf even by LLM standards. I'm guessing that instead of giving it a neutral prompt such as "respond to this comment" you gave it something more specific such as "defend yourself against these accusations"? I'm used to seeing them contradict themselves and say things that are obviously not true but usually when confronted they will give in and admit their mistake rather than dig a deeper hole.

orwin 11mo ago

I think that's probably the most beautiful AI-generated post that was ever generated. The fact that he posted it shows that either he didn't read it, didn't understood it, or thought it would be fun to show how the AI implementation was inferior to the one it was 'inspired' from.