3 ms·
> A political shift could kill military funding in the US. and lose the very thing that keeps the US top dog. You're implying that political shifts could happe
by chii 11mo ago
> A political shift could kill military funding in the US.
and lose the very thing that keeps the US top dog. You're implying that political shifts could happen to shift _anything_.
That's not true for things of fundamental importance. So is transit of fundamental importance?
- littlestymaar 11mo ago> You're implying that political shifts could happen to shift _anything_. Of course it could! One of the key lesson of the twentieth century is that, with political will, a modern state can do almost anything and political power can change the world dramatically very fast, for the better or the worse…
- freefrog1234 11mo ago> and lose the very thing that keeps the US top dog. You're implying that political shifts could happen to shift _anything_. It was the USD as reserve currency that enabled the US to fund it's military to a point that should have bankrupted the US. The US military hasn't won a war outside the Americas since WW2. With a budget half or a quarter of the current, the US would remain secure behind two oceans. I do agree that politically the military budget will remain high due to the relationship between the MIC and US government.
- mmooss 11mo ago> The US military hasn't won a war outside the Americas since WW2. The Gulf War and the war with ISIS. But yes, lots of bad results in Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan, etc. > With a budget half or a quarter of the current, the US would remain secure behind two oceans. I do agree that politically the military budget will remain high due to the relationship between the MIC and US government. The US can't be a self-sufficient island. It's not even close to plausible. Also, people do care about freedom for others everywhere; it's not just Americans who deserve it.
- Braxton1980 11mo agoYes. Transportation is of fundamental importance for the economy.