There are two fallacies being discussed here: 1) The fallacy that averaging two wrong answers will somehow magically give you the correct answer. 2) The falla

There are two fallacies being discussed here: 1) The fallacy that averaging two wrong answers will somehow magically give you the correct answer. 2) The fallacy that the opposite of a wrong answer must be correct. People who point out that partisans are committing the second fallacy are routinely accused (as you are doing here) of committing the first. This is a weaponized strategy which (somewhat ironically) employed by "both sides". It is quite possible for A to be wrong, the "political opposite" of A to be wrong, and their "political average" to also be wrong. The correct answer, if any is to be found, may well be hiding outside of the framing that "both sides" have agreed to use. But anyone trying to point this out will be accused (again, by "both sides") of engaging in "both side ism" because it threatens their shared hegemony. It's a stupid rhetorical trick, and adding more faux anger and swear words to your response isn't going to make me fall for it.