3 ms·

Without mentioning the source of the articles, it's completely useless. It would be hard to detect completely AI hallucinated articles, without a possibility to

by andix 11mo ago

Without mentioning the source of the articles, it's completely useless. It would be hard to detect completely AI hallucinated articles, without a possibility to check the authenticity of the content.

deleted 11mo ago
[deleted]
IshKebab 11mo ago
I agree. Why does this need to be AI?
- 1gn15 11mo ago
  Are you volunteering to transcribe it?
  - IshKebab 11mo ago
    Surely there are Wikipedia articles about these events, or news articles from the time?
bdangubic 11mo ago
> It would be hard to detect completely AI hallucinated articles, without a possibility to check the authenticity of the content. you can check in a public library or https://google.com https://google.com
- deleted 11mo ago
  [deleted]
- RobGR 11mo ago
  An automated system was already made to collect and sort them, that system should provide it's sources. I can self-fact-check anything, but a system that could provide origin sources and didn't is just AI slop.
  - bdangubic 11mo ago
    If human-generated content like this did not provide source would that be called “human slop”? what about system automated by a human coder without help of AI, also “human slop”?
    - andix 11mo ago
      Just „slop“. News usually either come from a reputable source, with internal standards you trust (newspaper). Or from someone who mentions their sources.
deleted 11mo ago
[deleted]