3 ms·
I don't want to believe it until it happens. NVIDIA and AMD can decide to undermine it if Linux doesn't yield enough profits for them. Even if only one of the
by jokoon 11mo ago
I don't want to believe it until it happens.
NVIDIA and AMD can decide to undermine it if Linux doesn't yield enough profits for them.
Even if only one of them undermines linux, linux gaming might have trouble progressing and game developers might just ignore Linux gaming.
Microsoft could also undermine it if they really wanted.
- bigyabai 11mo ago> NVIDIA and AMD can decide to undermine it if Linux doesn't yield enough profits for them. Can you elaborate what you mean, here? AMD has Mesa drivers for Vulkan 1.2+ compliance; their GPUs will support DXVK and Proton until the hardware breaks, even if they quit today. Nvidia's situation is slightly precarious, but the community has Nouveau and NOVA as hedged bets against them going rogue. And I can't see why they would ever go rogue - supporting Proton is so easy that many manufacturers do it by accident. Remember, even Apple Silicon supports DXVK on Asahi, despite Apple neither documenting their GPU, writing Vulkan drivers for it or designing their raster hardware around open standards. I'd be shocked if AMD or Nvidia managed to make a card that runs DirectX but refuses OpenGL and Vulkan bytecode in any form.
- npteljes 11mo agoThis is exactly why Valve's work is important with SteamOS. The more SteamOS devices people use, the more of a viable market they are, and so, a direct incentive is born, against locking games out of Linux. Personally, I don't think it will get worse than it is now. Some games are locked to some platforms, be that Windows, PS5 or Switch, and many great games can be enjoyed in Linux.