2 ms·

That's not what I'm saying at all. Waymo uses LIDAR to ensure safety. They use AI for most of the rest.

• JimDabell 1y ago
  > > While an error rate of 1-in-1,000 seems low, [...], on a task that requires successful execution of thousands of steps in a row, such a system results in inevitable failure. > This is also why (edit: non-LIDAR) FSD cars are an illusion. In this scenario, Waymo’s AI is executing thousands of steps in a row. The fact that it uses LIDAR for sensing doesn’t change that. It’s still AI driving you around no matter what its eyes are made of. Waymo is a counterexample to the point you were making and their use of LIDAR doesn’t change that.
  • amelius 1y ago
    No because safety is guaranteed by the LIDAR and navigation is done by GPS+classical algorithms. Mistakes made by the AI can be overcome by those two non-AI approaches + reiterating the AI-based steps.
    • JimDabell 1y ago
      LIDAR cannot possibly guarantee safety. It is a sensor.
      • amelius 1y ago
        That's like saying an algorithm cannot guarantee safety because it is not an actuator.
        • JimDabell 1y ago
          An algorithm controls the actuator. The sensor does not control the algorithms or the actuators.
          • amelius 1y ago
            Look, it is a hell of a lot safer to use an input that does not hallucinate objects than an input that does.