2 ms·
> Humans drive around with two mid-tier cameras on a pivot mount. Which means that any sufficiently advanced AI can do the same. Yes, if we can get their error
by amelius 1y ago
> Humans drive around with two mid-tier cameras on a pivot mount. Which means that any sufficiently advanced AI can do the same.
Yes, if we can get their error rate below 0.000001%. Until we get there, sensors + old school computer-vision provide safety.
- ACCount37 1y agoWhat makes you think that "sensors + old school computer-vision" gives you an error rate better than "completely fucked"?
- amelius 1y agoIn simple terms, the LIDAR sensor will allow you to do "If object at X, don't go to X". But obviously, you need more than that. Old school Kalman filters for object tracking etc.
- ACCount37 1y agoRaw dog LIDAR and "old school kalman filters" don't give you anywhere near good enough performance. Want to know how poor performance looks like in practice? Like Tesla phantom braking but ten times worse. And if you dial it down to avoid false positives, then it stops exerting any control over AI, and you're back to getting your AI to work well.