5 ms·

To this day, I still don't understand why Claude gets more acclaim for coding. Gemini 2.5 consistently outperformed Claude and ChatGPT mostly because of the muc

by oezi 11mo ago

To this day, I still don't understand why Claude gets more acclaim for coding. Gemini 2.5 consistently outperformed Claude and ChatGPT mostly because of the much larger context.

viraptor 11mo ago
Different styles of usage? I see Gemini praised for being able to feed the whole project and ask changes. Which is cool and all but... I never do that. Claude for me is better for specific modifications to specific parts of the app. There's a lot of context behind what's "better".
- Libidinalecon 11mo ago
  I can't really explain why I have barely used Gemini. I think it was just timing with the way models came out. This will be the first time I will have a Gemini subscription and nothing else. This will be the first time I really see what it can do fully.
dist-epoch 11mo ago
Gemini 2.5 couldn't apply an edit to a file if it's life depended on it. So unless you love copy/pasting code, Gemini 2.5 was useless for agentic coding. Great for taking it's output and asking Sonnet to apply it though.
artdigital 11mo ago
Claude doesn’t gaslight me, or flat out refuses to do something I ask it to because it believes it won’t work anyway. Gemini does Gemini also randomly just reverts everything because of some small mistake it found, makes assumptions without checking if those are true (eg this lib absolutely HAS TO HAVE a login() method. If we get a compile error it’s my env setup fault) It’s just not a pleasant model to work with
- khimaros 11mo ago
  confirmed, but also happens occasionally with Claude
nhumrich 11mo ago
The secret sauce isn't Claude the model, but Claude code the tool. Harness > model.
- brazukadev 11mo ago
  The secret sauce is the MCP that lots of people are starting to talk bad about.
WhyOhWhyQ 11mo ago
I'm not sure about this. I used gemini and claude for about 12 hours a day for a month and a half straight in an unhealthy programmer bender and claude was FAR superior. It was not really that close. Going to be interesting to test gemini 3 though.
- davidmurdoch 11mo ago
  Gemini 2.5 is prone to apology loops, and often confuses its own thinking to user input, replying to itself. Chat GPT 5 likes to refuse tasks with "sorry I can't help with that". At least in VSCode's GitHub Copilot Agent mode. Claude hasn't screwed up like that for me.
decide1000 11mo ago
I use Gemini cli, Claude Code and Codex daily. If I present the same bug to all 3, Gemini often is the one missing a part of the solution or drawing the wrong conclusion. I am curious for G3.
jarjoura 11mo ago
Gemini 2.5 and now 3 seem to continue their trend of being horrific in agentic tasks, but almost always impress me with the single first shot request. Claude Sonnet is way better about following up and making continuous improvements during a long running session. For some reason Gemini will hard freeze-up on the most random queries, and when it is able to successfully continue past the first call, it only keeps a weird summarized version of its previous run available to itself, even though it's in the payload. It's a weird model. My take is that, it's world-class at one-shotting, and if a task benefits from that, absolutely use it.

by oezi 11mo ago

To this day, I still don't understand why Claude gets more acclaim for coding. Gemini 2.5 consistently outperformed Claude and ChatGPT mostly because of the much larger context.

viraptor 11mo ago

Different styles of usage? I see Gemini praised for being able to feed the whole project and ask changes. Which is cool and all but... I never do that. Claude for me is better for specific modifications to specific parts of the app. There's a lot of context behind what's "better".

Libidinalecon 11mo ago
I can't really explain why I have barely used Gemini. I think it was just timing with the way models came out. This will be the first time I will have a Gemini subscription and nothing else. This will be the first time I really see what it can do fully.

dist-epoch 11mo ago

Gemini 2.5 couldn't apply an edit to a file if it's life depended on it. So unless you love copy/pasting code, Gemini 2.5 was useless for agentic coding. Great for taking it's output and asking Sonnet to apply it though.

artdigital 11mo ago

Claude doesn’t gaslight me, or flat out refuses to do something I ask it to because it believes it won’t work anyway. Gemini does Gemini also randomly just reverts everything because of some small mistake it found, makes assumptions without checking if those are true (eg this lib absolutely HAS TO HAVE a login() method. If we get a compile error it’s my env setup fault) It’s just not a pleasant model to work with

khimaros 11mo ago
confirmed, but also happens occasionally with Claude

nhumrich 11mo ago

The secret sauce isn't Claude the model, but Claude code the tool. Harness > model.

brazukadev 11mo ago
The secret sauce is the MCP that lots of people are starting to talk bad about.

WhyOhWhyQ 11mo ago

I'm not sure about this. I used gemini and claude for about 12 hours a day for a month and a half straight in an unhealthy programmer bender and claude was FAR superior. It was not really that close. Going to be interesting to test gemini 3 though.

davidmurdoch 11mo ago
Gemini 2.5 is prone to apology loops, and often confuses its own thinking to user input, replying to itself. Chat GPT 5 likes to refuse tasks with "sorry I can't help with that". At least in VSCode's GitHub Copilot Agent mode. Claude hasn't screwed up like that for me.

decide1000 11mo ago

I use Gemini cli, Claude Code and Codex daily. If I present the same bug to all 3, Gemini often is the one missing a part of the solution or drawing the wrong conclusion. I am curious for G3.

jarjoura 11mo ago

Gemini 2.5 and now 3 seem to continue their trend of being horrific in agentic tasks, but almost always impress me with the single first shot request. Claude Sonnet is way better about following up and making continuous improvements during a long running session. For some reason Gemini will hard freeze-up on the most random queries, and when it is able to successfully continue past the first call, it only keeps a weird summarized version of its previous run available to itself, even though it's in the payload. It's a weird model. My take is that, it's world-class at one-shotting, and if a task benefits from that, absolutely use it.