3 ms·
Wordpad was good for some stuff, I forget what, iirc it loaded in 0.1 seconds vs 0.01 for notepad.exe
by Neil44 11mo ago
Wordpad was good for some stuff, I forget what, iirc it loaded in 0.1 seconds vs 0.01 for notepad.exe
- toyg 11mo ago> Wordpad was good for some stuff, I forget what It was a proper WYSIWYG editor working with rich text, effectively a poor man's Word. Microsoft should have turned it into a markdown editor, instead of killing it.
- Neil44 11mo agoIt was, and worked well with rtf. I vaguely recall it being better than notepad if you were for example looking at strings in binary files, something like that, I forget...
- vrighter 11mo agoI often used it to convert unix style line endings to windows. Notepad choked on those, wordpad could load them easily, and just resaving them as a txt file converted them to windows line endings.
- inejge 11mo agoIIRC Wordpad was the only always-installed program which could open text files with Unix line endings and display them properly. Until at least Vista, Notepad would treat them as if containing a single line.