3 ms·
Thats an oversight on my part, I should put a license on it. I would love for anyone to be able to build one or tinker with the code as they want to. After all
by bit-hack 11mo ago
Thats an oversight on my part, I should put a license on it. I would love for anyone to be able to build one or tinker with the code as they want to. After all I was only able to make this because others shared their projects that I could learn from.
- Brian_K_White 11mo agoI would suggest CC-BY-SA You can do this by doing as little as making a single file named LICENSE in the top level directory, with a single line: This work is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 That's it. It is the hardware/artwork spritual equivalent of GPL2. It means the user must not remove your name, must make source/plans available, and commercial activity is ok. Just a suggestion if you don't know where to begin or what to do, hadn't really thought about it or read up on all the infinite options etc.
- qingcharles 11mo agoThank you so much for this. The sheer amount of work, skills and knowledge you put into getting this to boot and operate is fantastic. And I think everyone here agrees that you did this in the best way: by using a real CPU. Really appreciate you sharing this with us.