3 ms·
Yes, it would be 20% wasteful. But giving up freedom can be more costly. Also, the 20% would be open to further optimization by the community, so it wouldn't b
by amelius 1y ago
Yes, it would be 20% wasteful. But giving up freedom can be more costly.
Also, the 20% would be open to further optimization by the community, so it wouldn't be that bad in practice, probably.
- musebox35 1y agoIn some commercial contexts with the savings from that 20%, you can buy a lot freedom and then with the freedom you bought you can make more free things :)
- amelius 1y agoCould all be true, maybe, somehow. But I sleep better when my castle is not in someone else's kingdom. That alone is enough for me to accept the small performance penalty.