5 ms·
Yes. People do not want AI generated content without explicit consent, and "slop" is a derogatory term for AI generated content, ergo, people are willing to pa
by DiabloD3 11mo ago
Yes.
People do not want AI generated content without explicit consent, and "slop" is a derogatory term for AI generated content, ergo, people are willing to pay money for working slop detection.
I wasn't big on Kagi, but I dunno man, I'm suddenly willing to hear them out.
- cactusplant7374 11mo agoHow about when English isn't someone's first language and they are using AI to rewrite their thoughts into something more cohesive? You see this a lot on reddit.
- ares623 11mo agoThat’s one of the collateral damage in all this, just like all the people who lost their jobs due to AI driven layoffs.
- ourguile 11mo agoI would assume then, that someone can report it as "not slop", per their documentation: https://help.kagi.com/kagi/features/slopstop.html#reporting-content https://help.kagi.com/kagi/features/slopstop.html#reporting-...
- Zambyte 11mo agoNot all AI generated content is slop. Translation is a great use case for LLMs, and almost certainly would not get someone flagged as slop if that is all they are doing with it.
- JumpCrisscross 11mo ago> How about when English isn't someone's first language and they are using AI to rewrite their thoughts into something more cohesive? They should honestly use a different tool. Translation is a space in which language models are diverse, competitive and competent. If your translated content sounds like ChatGPT, it's going to be dismissed. Unfairly, perhaps. But consistently nevertheless.
- cactusplant7374 11mo agoThey want to turn two sentences into four paragraphs.