3 ms·
Are you unable to engage with the full context of the situation? You repeatedly refer to the OP in your comments but there is a much larger context. Simple log
by blobbers 11mo ago
Are you unable to engage with the full context of the situation? You repeatedly refer to the OP in your comments but there is a much larger context.
Simple logic, see if you can follow:
1. Sophie publishes flawed research (nitroglycerin for osteoporosis)
2. Sophie practices medicine and gives patients nitroglycerin for osteoporosis, with knowledge that her study is a lie. This causes harm to patients, because she knowingly gives them a therapy that doesn’t work. This is malpractice.
- bonsai_spool 11mo ago> Are you unable to engage with the full context of the situation? Absolutely. I am also able to - Not make attacks at the person making arguments. - Not assume that the OP's mother received nitroglycerin > Simple logic, see if you can follow: You are assuming facts not in evidence, buddy. > This is malpractice. This is the absolute definition of a straw man.