3 ms·
It looks like it's designed to inflict maximum harm, but it seems that it's actually less likely to kill you than an F-150 or Silverado or Ram. It has a lower
by bryanlarsen 1y ago
It looks like it's designed to inflict maximum harm, but it seems that it's actually less likely to kill you than an F-150 or Silverado or Ram. It has a lower hood height which is the aspect that has been hypothesized to be the reason that trucks kill pedestrians at a much greater rate than cars.
I'm not trying to condone Cybertruck here. I hope the Cybertruck becomes a rallying cry to mandate pedestrian safety in the US, and that mandate becomes data driven and indicts F-150 et al.
- anonporridge 1y agoCybertruck is a great case study in how people confuse form for function. In a world where technology is advancing exponentially, aesthetics increasingly offer a poor signal for performance, and only those who obsessively look under the hood and disregard form will see through it all.
- testing22321 1y agoYep. There were endless articles and hundreds of comments here about how atrocious the crash safety of the cyber truck must be for occupants. Everyone knew for a fact it had no crumple zone, etc. Then the actual crash testing data comes out…… And crickets. Peoples intuition is very, very wrong.
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- bee_rider 1y agoAre there enough Cybertrucks on the roads for us to detect their danger levels statistically? I’ve never seen one and I don’t live in the middle of nowhere or anything…
- VBprogrammer 1y agoWe seen a good dozen or more in a couple of weeks in Orlando. To be clear, I agree with you on them being statistically insignificant.
- Freedom2 1y agoThe problem is that Cybertruck drivers are likely to have a boisterous driving style which may skew the results - what other kind of personality would purchase a vehicle that is less practical than other trucks, less practical than other EVs and, whether we like it or not, carries a signal to other people on the road.
- CoastalCoder 1y ago> The problem is that Cybertruck drivers are likely to have a boisterous driving style What leads you to believe that?
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- IshKebab 1y agoYeah it seems like a lower hood height would be an improvement, but it's also pretty obvious that sharp corners are going to make things much worse! There's no way you can say "it seems that it's actually less likely to kill you"...
- stickfigure 1y agoFortNine did a great rundown on this phenomenon last year: "Grilles That Kill" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YpuX-5E7xoU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YpuX-5E7xoU
- masklinn 1y agoNJB did as well: https://youtu.be/jN7mSXMruEo https://youtu.be/jN7mSXMruEo
- bryanlarsen 1y agoFor the stereo-typical truck driver, a motorcycle Youtube channel is going to be much more sympathetic than a bicycle channel. Of course the stereotype doesn't always apply, I certainly know people who have transporting bicycles as a major use case for their truck.
- rootusrootus 1y agoIt's certainly a conversation worth having, but a fundamental difference between the CT and something like an F150 is utility -- the CT is unapologetically a lifestyle vehicle emphasizing form over function. A regular pickup is very utilitarian. I know it's fashionable to argue that half-ton pickups are very commonly used as lifestyle pickups too, but at least the design is clearly aimed at function over form. So the argument probably is less about how the design should change, but how to avoid incentivizing the use of utility vehicles for family duty. Disclaimer: I drive an F150 Lightning, so I'm part of the problem I suppose; but damn if it isn't just about the most useful all-around family vehicle I've ever owned. As long as you don't routinely drive downtown, and I don't.
- ifyoubuildit 1y agoI can't say I agree that "regular pickups" are very utilitarian, unless you're talking about the base trim work trucks. They seem to me to be incredibly expensive luxury vehicles for the most part.
- bryanlarsen 1y agoA pickup from the last century is utilitarian with their 8 foot beds and a box height low enough to reach in from the side. Modern pickups much less so.
- l1tany11 1y ago90s trucks sure. But they turned into tonka trucks over the last 30 years. The grills and everything just keep getting bigger. It’s actually worse than that though. Ford got rid of the heavy duty package on the f150 and said to customers “just buy the f250 instead”. Which is even more tonka.
- philistine 1y agoThe design 100% has to change. There is a marketing battle for the highest hood, since it looks dope as fuck. We should mandate a maximum hood height for all vehicles that's dependent on driver visibility. When the next F-150 needs three steps to enter because the hood is too high and we woke up and mandated that pedestrian visibility needs to be maintained, then that's when change will happen.
- Zigurd 1y agoTwo wrongs don't make a right. Stupidly tall grills that look butch, kill people who would've survived the impact but for the vanity of the truck buyer. Now we get the only pickup that is bucking that trend, but it has knife-sharp edges. We live on the stupid timeline.