4 ms·
This is a meta review that looked at a selection of other reviews that all suggested a correlation does exist. This meta review is pointing out that they believ
by thegrim33 11mo ago
This is a meta review that looked at a selection of other reviews that all suggested a correlation does exist. This meta review is pointing out that they believe there's not strong enough evidence in those other reviews to say concretely, scientifically, that there's a link. Only a tentative link. This is in no way a study saying that there is no link. It's a study saying there's not enough of a preponderance of evidence in all these other studies to definitively say there's a link.
- hshdhdhj4444 11mo agoIn other words, there’s no evidence of a link.
- add-sub-mul-div 11mo agoIn today's both-sides-poisoned discourse, it would be considered biased or betray an agenda to recognize that only one side has a burden of proof.
- unparagoned 11mo agoNo, there is strong evidence of a correlation. There isn’t sufficient evidence either way around causality