3 ms·
I'm sure, but luajit wins handily over all the scripting interpreters. I'm not much concerned with ruby in particular. I'm suspicious that luajit is constrain
by kingkongrevenge 18y ago
I'm sure, but luajit wins handily over all the scripting interpreters. I'm not much concerned with ruby in particular. I'm suspicious that luajit is constrained in features. I doubt you can dynamically load in object code for modules, for example. This makes it not quite a straightforward comparison to the other interpreters.
- LogicHoleFlaw 18y agoActually, this is incorrect. LuaJIT is explicitly compatible with the standard Lua ABI for modules. http://luajit.org/luajit_features.html http://luajit.org/luajit_features.html Since it is able to use certain non-ANSI C features on the various platforms it supports it can do other neat things like enable coroutine calls across Lua/C stack boundaries.