> 1. Who else would document a company's restructure if not the company itself? If the company wants to give numbers, I'll listen to them. But the company mad

> 1. Who else would document a company's restructure if not the company itself? If the company wants to give numbers, I'll listen to them. But the company made vague/unproven claims and that's not enough. Journalists can investigate. > 2. Yes, not reading an article and commenting on it is bad faith. Commenting on something talked about in the article doesn't require reading that specific article. You can use other sources. > 3. So you have no evidence of it not being as the company says, just the vibes of others on this thread, okay Senator. Other people brought objective numbers. Not vibes. Why should I not use those numbers? You have not claimed any of those numbers are wrong, you're just calling people's conclusions wrong.