3 ms·
Just to point, but there's no more data. LLMs would always bottleneck on one of those two, as computing demand grows crazy quickly with the data amount, and da
by marcosdumay 1y ago
Just to point, but there's no more data.
LLMs would always bottleneck on one of those two, as computing demand grows crazy quickly with the data amount, and data is necessarily limited. Turns out people threw crazy amounts of compute into it, so the we got the other limit.
- bigyabai 1y agoSynthetic data works.
- marcyb5st 1y agoThere's a limit to that according to: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-07566-y https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-07566-y . Basically, if you use an LLM to augment a training dataset it will become "dumber" every subsequent generation and I am not sure how you can generate synthetic data for a language model without using a language model
- yorwba 1y agoSynthetic data doesn't have to come from an LLM. And that paper only showed that if you train on a random sample from an LLM, the resulting second LLM is a worse model of the distribution that the first LLM was trained on. When people construct synthetic data with LLMs, they typically do not just sample at random, but carefully shape the generation process to match the target task better than the original training distribution.
- Alex2037 1y ago[dead]
- Mistletoe 1y agoYeah I’m constantly reminded of a quote about this- you can’t make another internet. LLMs already digested the one we have.
- bubblelicious 1y agoEpoch has a pretty good analysis of bottlenecks here: https://epoch.ai/blog/can-ai-scaling-continue-through-2030 https://epoch.ai/blog/can-ai-scaling-continue-through-2030 There is plenty of data left, we don’t just train with crawled text data. Power constraints may turn out to be the real bottleneck but we’re like 4 orders of magnitude away