3 ms·

Not to be confused with Old Farmer's Almanac (est. 1792) and yet sad to see a 200 years old periodical closing up shop.

• owlninja 11mo ago
  This is the one my mind went to, mostly because that cover is so familiar. Granted, I never invested much time in either but was always glad they existed.
• steviedotboston 11mo ago
  the old farmers almanac is the one people are probably more familiar with
• np_tedious 11mo ago
  https://www.almanac.com/old-farmers-almanac-233-years-and-still-going-strong https://www.almanac.com/old-farmers-almanac-233-years-and-st... They appear experienced at navigating this confusion
  • andrepd 11mo ago
    Damn, I would expect at least a word of courtesy towards a fellow multicentennial publication.
    • darkwater 11mo ago
      Saying "after an incredible 200+ year run." seems enough chivalrous for me.
    • energy123 11mo ago
      We all know they're popping the champagne
• bcherry 11mo ago
  wow thanks for leaving this comment - i now realize two things: 1. the farmer's almanac i thought of when i saw the title and even read the article is not going anywhere 2. i have never before heard of the farmer's almanac referred to in this notice
• rcleveng 11mo ago
  Wow, I had never heard of that new one until today! Was worried for a bit.
• amelius 11mo ago
  Does this mean they can now rename the Old Farmer's Almanac to the Farmer's Almanac?