3 ms·
They strike first, and then if there are any survivors, which there usually are not, they seem to release them to their home countries ( https://www.cnn.com/202
by CobrastanJorji 1y ago
They strike first, and then if there are any survivors, which there usually are not, they seem to release them to their home countries ( https://www.cnn.com/2025/10/18/politics/caribbean-boat-strike-survivors https://www.cnn.com/2025/10/18/politics/caribbean-boat-strik... ).
Now, you may ask "if these are criminal drug traffickers that need to be killed, why would we release survivors instead of arresting them and charging them with a crime?"
- thunky 1y agoTo be fair (not that this is a good excuse) the article says: The two surviving terrorists are being returned to their Countries of origin, Ecuador and Colombia, for detention and prosecution,”
- BLKNSLVR 1y ago> for detention and prosecution ie. the hard bit.
- qingcharles 1y agoThe countries said there was nothing to prosecute and they have zero evidence of any crime committed by the released persons, IIRC.
- enaaem 1y agoBut why? If they are terrorists why would you release them?
- tjpnz 1y agoOccam's razor.