3 ms·
> people are calling it a clown show Not "people" -- a single, unnamed, VC. It's right there in the article. Read it. > Prasad was ousted No, he wasn't. He v
by timr 1y ago
> people are calling it a clown show
Not "people" -- a single, unnamed, VC. It's right there in the article. Read it.
> Prasad was ousted
No, he wasn't. He voluntarily resigned pre-emptively after the WSJ editorials, then he was re-hired almost immediately. You are just misinformed. You'd know this if you read a better source.
- abduhl 1y agoSo, again, you’re not showing how it’s an ad hominem, you’re just disagreeing with the biased reporting.
- timr 1y agoWhere did I say it was an ad hominem?
- abduhl 1y ago>> Instead of just reporting the facts of the case (as was done by the Stat piece, which they're ripping off) they spend multiple paragraphs making ad hominem attacks about the CDC, Prasad, etc. Almost unbelievably, they put those things first.
- timr 1y agoTouché. I shouldn't have said "ad hominem attacks", because, while these arguments are certainly specious, and completely unrelated to the subject of the article, they're not strictly ad hominem. I agree with your comment that my criticism is (and was) biased reporting.