5 ms·

> It had approximately 50% of my trips, and frequently only had only one leg of the journey Relevant current news: Home Office denying child benefits to 1000s

> It had approximately 50% of my trips, and frequently only had only one leg of the journey Relevant current news: Home Office denying child benefits to 1000s of people because they had incomplete data of people vacation trips, so people were thought to have emigrated and never returned [0]. Some people who never even left (due to cancelled flights, denied boardings etc.) were also affected. [0] https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2025/nov/01/hmrc-likely-to-have-breached-privacy-laws-in-stopping-child-benefit-experts https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2025/nov/01/hmrc-likely...

zarzavat 1y ago
This is because the UK doesn't have exit checks. They rely on airlines to submit the information to them. I guess this makes sense when you consider that there's an open border with Ireland. Though you'd think that the UK and Ireland could get together to track exits...
- jen729w 1y ago
  The UK's borders used to be hilariously lax. In 2000 I travelled a lot. To leave, as you note, you just left. To return, you'd walk past a man at Heathrow who was invariably reading the paper. He had his feet up on the desk. You were walking at a clip, passport held aloft, photo page ostensibly open towards him. That was it. Immigrated.
  - aprdm 1y ago
    In 2014 I landed on either Heathrow or another London airport I don’t remember coming from Spain after a vacation I read on a sign “travellers from Europe this way” and I thought ok my flight came from Spain I’m going that way … when I saw I was out of the airport with no immigration whatsoever In hindsight it obviously meant if you’re European (which I’m not), I was in shock how easy someone could get in the UK !
    - bluGill 1y ago
      I don't know about UK, but my experience is the signs for EU and non-EU point different directions, but either way you just go through a door that leads to the exact same place. I've been told that when they are looking for "something" they will put extra checks at the non-EU door, but if you have a US passport (I presume other countries like Canada) in hand they will send you through the EU door.
    - sksksk 1y ago
      Are you sure your passport wasn’t checked? What you’re describing sounds like it was the customs check. Pre-brexit, if you were arriving from the EU, then there was no customs check since we were all part of the same customs union. The usual flow is immigration check -> baggage collection -> customs check
      - aprdm 1y ago
        Yeah wasn’t checked. I’m pretty sure it was a smaller airport than Heathrow. I definitely went through the wrong path out
        ssdspoimdsjvv 1y ago
        Perhaps your passport was checked on departure instead of on arrival? At least that's how it worked when taking the Eurostar train.
      - strbean 1y ago
        Even if they did check his passport, he didn't have an EU passport so probably shouldn't have been allowed to skip customs.
        sksksk 1y ago
        From a customs perspective, flying from one EU country to another EU is treated like a domestic flight. If I (a British citizen) flew from London to New York, then on to Chicago; I'd expect to go through customs when I arrived at New York, but not when I arrived at Chicago.
  - somanyphotons 1y ago
    2 years ago I landed at London City (from Zurich), got off the plane and then we all walked all the way to the exit without being stopped by a single human to check passports or customs. I couldn't believe it. I am not a British or EU citizen
- immibis 1y ago
  * * *
  - deleted 1y ago
    [deleted]
  - donohoe 1y ago
    Speak for yourself, not the Irish.
  - argsnd 1y ago
    this is a genuinely awful description of Irish history
    - deleted 1y ago
      [deleted]
  - deleted 1y ago
    [deleted]
  - logifail 1y ago
    > The open border treaty was put in place because the alternative was either giving the territory back, or nonstop terrorism (look up the Irish Republican Army) until they gave the territory back. The Common Travel Area's origins are in the the period 1923-1925[0], although it wasn't called that back then... [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_Travel_Area https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_Travel_Area
  - bmn__ 1y ago
    > Ireland dislikes the UK since the UK invaded it This was centuries before the UK. The Normans came to Ireland by invitation of Macmurphy, King of Leinster, to help him restore his power, in exchange for promises of territory. This barely counts as a conquest CB, but with certainty not as an invasion.
    - steve_adams_86 1y ago
      The Tudor conquest of Ireland involved the English and Scottish. It was before the UK existed, but was perpetrated by the constituents of the UK. At least, the ancestors of the contemporary constituents. Maybe not of Wales though, I don't know.
- walthamstow 1y ago
  20+ years of lighting our hair on fire over immigration and we still have no idea who is in the country.
  - Telemakhos 1y ago
    Starmer addressed this a while back, accusing the Tories of campaigning on reducing immigration while actually running an experiment in open borders. Having made this statement, he then proceeded to do nothing about immigration himself. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/video/2024/nov/28/keir-starmer-on-migration-tories-ran-open-borders-experiment-video https://www.theguardian.com/politics/video/2024/nov/28/keir-... It seems to be a bipartisan thing in the UK to recognize that the electorate really doesn’t want immigration, and then not to fulfill the will of the electorate. Instead, the politicians use that will to accomplish unrelated goals like imposing a national digital ID.
    - bluGill 1y ago
      > the electorate really doesn’t want immigration Is that the case or is there just a significant minority that cares and the rest are happy enough as things are and would get mad if there was change - thus making their approach rational: get the votes of those who care but don't do anything because then you will be voted out next term. I don't know myself, but this is something that I've wondered about a lot of issues that I care about where nothing happens. (I've long been on the side of more immigration)
    - roelschroeven 1y ago
      Politicians like campaign on reducing immigration because it's an easy thing to campaign on. They don't like to actually do anything about it because (1) it's hard, especially when you want to comply with laws and treaties and (2) effectively reducing immigration could hamper the ability to campaign on reducing immigration.
    - mschuster91 1y ago
      > It seems to be a bipartisan thing in the UK to recognize that the electorate really doesn’t want immigration Usually, it's not an "inner wish" of the electorate, but the electorate gets manipulated to feel that way by mass media, especially tabloids. Outrage sells, after all, especially when it can be laced to make it more effective. The problem at the core is that immigration is vital for societies, especially the low-pay-hard-labor segment. Has the UK found a replacement for Ukrainian and Polish farm workers yet [1]? [1] https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/aug/15/pounds-60m-in-uk-crops-left-to-rot-lack-of-workers-nfu-farming https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/aug/15/pounds-6...
- anon98356 1y ago
  In the context of the issue that doesn't really make sense. The issue is that the home office think you left and didn't come back. How would an exit check tell the home office you have come back into the country?
  - zarzavat 1y ago
    In a country that has exit checks, in order to go airside, a border agent will stamp you out and record your exit. If you were to get stamped out and then decide that you don't want to catch your flight after all, you'd have to get stamped back in again (often not a real stamp these days). In the UK there's no exit checks. The only information they have is that you booked a flight. This is "Advance Passenger Information" which all airlines are legally required to submit. They don't know if you've actually boarded the flight, they just assume that if you booked a flight that it means you left the country. The exit check doesn't tell them that you've come back, they know that already unless you cross the land border. But it does tell them that you truly left and stop the guesswork.
- eru 1y ago
  > I guess this makes sense when you consider that there's an open border with Ireland. Weren't the other borders with the Schengen area open, too? Eg if you take a small boat from England to Denmark, no one needed to check anything.

zarzavat 1y ago

This is because the UK doesn't have exit checks. They rely on airlines to submit the information to them. I guess this makes sense when you consider that there's an open border with Ireland. Though you'd think that the UK and Ireland could get together to track exits...

jen729w 1y ago
The UK's borders used to be hilariously lax. In 2000 I travelled a lot. To leave, as you note, you just left. To return, you'd walk past a man at Heathrow who was invariably reading the paper. He had his feet up on the desk. You were walking at a clip, passport held aloft, photo page ostensibly open towards him. That was it. Immigrated.
- aprdm 1y ago
  In 2014 I landed on either Heathrow or another London airport I don’t remember coming from Spain after a vacation I read on a sign “travellers from Europe this way” and I thought ok my flight came from Spain I’m going that way … when I saw I was out of the airport with no immigration whatsoever In hindsight it obviously meant if you’re European (which I’m not), I was in shock how easy someone could get in the UK !
  - bluGill 1y ago
    I don't know about UK, but my experience is the signs for EU and non-EU point different directions, but either way you just go through a door that leads to the exact same place. I've been told that when they are looking for "something" they will put extra checks at the non-EU door, but if you have a US passport (I presume other countries like Canada) in hand they will send you through the EU door.
  - sksksk 1y ago
    Are you sure your passport wasn’t checked? What you’re describing sounds like it was the customs check. Pre-brexit, if you were arriving from the EU, then there was no customs check since we were all part of the same customs union. The usual flow is immigration check -> baggage collection -> customs check
    - aprdm 1y ago
      Yeah wasn’t checked. I’m pretty sure it was a smaller airport than Heathrow. I definitely went through the wrong path out
      - ssdspoimdsjvv 1y ago
        Perhaps your passport was checked on departure instead of on arrival? At least that's how it worked when taking the Eurostar train.
    - strbean 1y ago
      Even if they did check his passport, he didn't have an EU passport so probably shouldn't have been allowed to skip customs.
      - sksksk 1y ago
        From a customs perspective, flying from one EU country to another EU is treated like a domestic flight. If I (a British citizen) flew from London to New York, then on to Chicago; I'd expect to go through customs when I arrived at New York, but not when I arrived at Chicago.
- somanyphotons 1y ago
  2 years ago I landed at London City (from Zurich), got off the plane and then we all walked all the way to the exit without being stopped by a single human to check passports or customs. I couldn't believe it. I am not a British or EU citizen
immibis 1y ago
* * *
- deleted 1y ago
  [deleted]
- donohoe 1y ago
  Speak for yourself, not the Irish.
- argsnd 1y ago
  this is a genuinely awful description of Irish history
  - deleted 1y ago
    [deleted]
- deleted 1y ago
  [deleted]
- logifail 1y ago
  > The open border treaty was put in place because the alternative was either giving the territory back, or nonstop terrorism (look up the Irish Republican Army) until they gave the territory back. The Common Travel Area's origins are in the the period 1923-1925[0], although it wasn't called that back then... [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_Travel_Area https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_Travel_Area
- bmn__ 1y ago
  > Ireland dislikes the UK since the UK invaded it This was centuries before the UK. The Normans came to Ireland by invitation of Macmurphy, King of Leinster, to help him restore his power, in exchange for promises of territory. This barely counts as a conquest CB, but with certainty not as an invasion.
  - steve_adams_86 1y ago
    The Tudor conquest of Ireland involved the English and Scottish. It was before the UK existed, but was perpetrated by the constituents of the UK. At least, the ancestors of the contemporary constituents. Maybe not of Wales though, I don't know.
walthamstow 1y ago
20+ years of lighting our hair on fire over immigration and we still have no idea who is in the country.
- Telemakhos 1y ago
  Starmer addressed this a while back, accusing the Tories of campaigning on reducing immigration while actually running an experiment in open borders. Having made this statement, he then proceeded to do nothing about immigration himself. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/video/2024/nov/28/keir-starmer-on-migration-tories-ran-open-borders-experiment-video https://www.theguardian.com/politics/video/2024/nov/28/keir-... It seems to be a bipartisan thing in the UK to recognize that the electorate really doesn’t want immigration, and then not to fulfill the will of the electorate. Instead, the politicians use that will to accomplish unrelated goals like imposing a national digital ID.
  - bluGill 1y ago
    > the electorate really doesn’t want immigration Is that the case or is there just a significant minority that cares and the rest are happy enough as things are and would get mad if there was change - thus making their approach rational: get the votes of those who care but don't do anything because then you will be voted out next term. I don't know myself, but this is something that I've wondered about a lot of issues that I care about where nothing happens. (I've long been on the side of more immigration)
  - roelschroeven 1y ago
    Politicians like campaign on reducing immigration because it's an easy thing to campaign on. They don't like to actually do anything about it because (1) it's hard, especially when you want to comply with laws and treaties and (2) effectively reducing immigration could hamper the ability to campaign on reducing immigration.
  - mschuster91 1y ago
    > It seems to be a bipartisan thing in the UK to recognize that the electorate really doesn’t want immigration Usually, it's not an "inner wish" of the electorate, but the electorate gets manipulated to feel that way by mass media, especially tabloids. Outrage sells, after all, especially when it can be laced to make it more effective. The problem at the core is that immigration is vital for societies, especially the low-pay-hard-labor segment. Has the UK found a replacement for Ukrainian and Polish farm workers yet [1]? [1] https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/aug/15/pounds-60m-in-uk-crops-left-to-rot-lack-of-workers-nfu-farming https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/aug/15/pounds-6...
anon98356 1y ago
In the context of the issue that doesn't really make sense. The issue is that the home office think you left and didn't come back. How would an exit check tell the home office you have come back into the country?
- zarzavat 1y ago
  In a country that has exit checks, in order to go airside, a border agent will stamp you out and record your exit. If you were to get stamped out and then decide that you don't want to catch your flight after all, you'd have to get stamped back in again (often not a real stamp these days). In the UK there's no exit checks. The only information they have is that you booked a flight. This is "Advance Passenger Information" which all airlines are legally required to submit. They don't know if you've actually boarded the flight, they just assume that if you booked a flight that it means you left the country. The exit check doesn't tell them that you've come back, they know that already unless you cross the land border. But it does tell them that you truly left and stop the guesswork.
eru 1y ago
> I guess this makes sense when you consider that there's an open border with Ireland. Weren't the other borders with the Schengen area open, too? Eg if you take a small boat from England to Denmark, no one needed to check anything.