5 ms·
OpenAI invests heavily into integration with other products. If model development stalls they just need to be not worse than other stalled models while taking a
by DenisM 1y ago
OpenAI invests heavily into integration with other products. If model development stalls they just need to be not worse than other stalled models while taking advantage of brand recognition and momentum to stay ahead in other areas.
In that sense it makes sense to keep spending billions even f model development is nearing diminishing return - it forces competition to do the same and in that game victory belongs to the guy with deeper pockets.
Investors know that, too. A lot of startup business is a popularity contents - number one is more attractive for the sheer fact of being number one. If you’re a very rational investor and don’t believe in the product you still have to play this game because others are playing it, making it true. The vortex will not stop unless limited partners start pushing back.
- otherjason 1y agoBut, if model development stalls, and everyone else is stalled as well, then what happens to turn the current wildly-unprofitable industry into something that "it makes sense to keep spending billions" on?
- accrual 1y agoI suspect if model development stalls we may start to see more incremental releases to models, perhaps with specific fixes or improvements, updates to a certain cutoff date, etc. So less fanfare, but still some progress. Worth spending billions on? Probably not, but the next best avenue would be to continue developing deeper and deeper LLM integrations to stay relevant and in the news. The new OpenAI browser integration would be an example. Mostly the same model, but with a whole new channel of potential customers and lock in.
- camdenreslink 1y agoIf model development stalls, then the open weight free models will eventually totally catch up. The model itself will become a complete commodity.
- DenisM 1y agoIt very well might. The ones with most smooth integrations and applications will win. This can go either way. For databases open source integration tools prevailed, the commercial activity left hosting those tools. But enterprise software integration that might end up mostly proprietary.
- vineyardmike 1y agoBecause they’re not that wildly unprofitable. Yes, obviously the companies spend a ton of money on training, but several have said that each model is independently “profitable” - the income from selling access to the model has overcome the costs of training it. It’s just that revenues haven’t overcome the cost of training the next one, which gets bigger every time.
- alangibson 1y ago> the income from selling access to the model has overcome the costs of training it. Citation needed. This is completely untrue AFAIK. They've claimed that inference is profitable, but not that they are making a profit when training costs are included.
- JohnnyMarcone 1y agoI've also seen Open AI and Anthropic say it's pretty close at least. I'll try to follow up with a source.
- chii 1y agoThe bigger threat is if their models "stall", while a new up-start discovers an even better model/training method. What _could_ prevent this from happening is the lack of available data today - everybody and their dog is trying to keep crawlers off, or make sure their data is no longer "safe"/"easy" to be used to train with.
- DenisM 1y agoThey can also buy out the startup or match the development by hiring more people. Their comp packages are very competitive.