3 ms·

Extremely bad movie. Fearmonger porn with good acting. Spoilers ahead, in case you decide to watch this bleak 2 hour waste of time: "Oooh, nothing works, oooh

Extremely bad movie. Fearmonger porn with good acting. Spoilers ahead, in case you decide to watch this bleak 2 hour waste of time: "Oooh, nothing works, ooohh, we're going to die". This should've been a 15 minute YouTube video, not a movie.

senordevnyc 1y ago
It being bleak has nothing to do with whether or not it's good. If you have some specific complaint, name it. I found it excellent.
array_key_first 1y ago
> "Oooh, nothing works, ooohh, we're going to die" I mean, to be fair, this is the actual situation with nuclear weapons. There's nothing you can do. You just... die. Everyone. There's no magic bullshit the US can pull out of it's ass to prevent it. One singular nuclear warhead can be enough to eradicate the entire population in the US.
- science4sail 1y ago
  > One singular nuclear warhead can be enough to eradicate the entire population in the US. How big would this warhead be? "One singular nuclear warhead" wasn't enough to eradicate the entire populations of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, much less Japan.
- dekhn 1y ago
  Modern ICBMs don't have payloads that large. A single warhead does not eradicate the entire population of the US- if you believe so, can you articulate the mechanism?
  - adriand 1y ago
    Warhead is incoming, US retaliates, its adversaries retaliate, we’re all dead. If you think that wouldn’t happen, then you have to believe the US would accept a nuclear strike on one of its population centers and respond with conventional force and/or law enforcement. I am not confident!
    - dekhn 1y ago
      I was responding to the "single nuke kills everybody" statement. I didn't say anything about MAD. Modern nuclear strategy does not aim to use nuclear weapons to immediately kill everybody in the US. We moved away from really big payloads towards smaller independent payloads with better targeting precision, along with greatly reducing the size of the stockpile.

senordevnyc 1y ago

It being bleak has nothing to do with whether or not it's good. If you have some specific complaint, name it. I found it excellent.

array_key_first 1y ago

> "Oooh, nothing works, ooohh, we're going to die" I mean, to be fair, this is the actual situation with nuclear weapons. There's nothing you can do. You just... die. Everyone. There's no magic bullshit the US can pull out of it's ass to prevent it. One singular nuclear warhead can be enough to eradicate the entire population in the US.

science4sail 1y ago
> One singular nuclear warhead can be enough to eradicate the entire population in the US. How big would this warhead be? "One singular nuclear warhead" wasn't enough to eradicate the entire populations of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, much less Japan.
dekhn 1y ago
Modern ICBMs don't have payloads that large. A single warhead does not eradicate the entire population of the US- if you believe so, can you articulate the mechanism?
- adriand 1y ago
  Warhead is incoming, US retaliates, its adversaries retaliate, we’re all dead. If you think that wouldn’t happen, then you have to believe the US would accept a nuclear strike on one of its population centers and respond with conventional force and/or law enforcement. I am not confident!
  - dekhn 1y ago
    I was responding to the "single nuke kills everybody" statement. I didn't say anything about MAD. Modern nuclear strategy does not aim to use nuclear weapons to immediately kill everybody in the US. We moved away from really big payloads towards smaller independent payloads with better targeting precision, along with greatly reducing the size of the stockpile.