7 ms·
It used to be cv dazzle [0] is 15 years young. But its questionable if it works anymore. Theres also a bunch of of digital camo, most seem to target IR cameras
by RansomStark 1y ago
It used to be cv dazzle [0] is 15 years young. But its questionable if it works anymore.
Theres also a bunch of of digital camo, most seem to target IR cameras [1] here's a homebrew version.
[0] https://adam.harvey.studio/cvdazzle https://adam.harvey.studio/cvdazzle
[1] https://www.macpierce.com/the-camera-shy-hoodie https://www.macpierce.com/the-camera-shy-hoodie
- Hizonner 1y ago> It used to be cv dazzle [0] is 15 years young. But its questionable if it works anymore. I fed all the CV Dazzle demo pictures into some free Amazon facial recognition demo a few years ago. It was a pretty shitty demo, but the makeup didn't even slow it down. It had no trouble at all finding the faces, assigning ages or genders, or locating facial features. And once you've located the features, you're going to have no trouble identifying the person if they're in the database.
- RansomStark 1y agoThat makes sense, the CV dazzle styles for designed for a specific algorithm that went out of use around a decade ago. There have been some updated styles for CNN based models, but never tried them, the originals did work back in the day