I normally dont waste a lot of energy on politics. But this feels truly dystopian. We here on HN are all in our bubble, we know that AI responses are very pron

I normally dont waste a lot of energy on politics. But this feels truly dystopian. We here on HN are all in our bubble, we know that AI responses are very prone to error and just great in mimicking. We can differentiate when to use and when not (more or less), but when I talk to non-tech people in a normal city not close to a tech hub, most of them treat ChatGPT as the all-knowing factual instance. They have no idea of the concious and unconcious bias on the responses, based on how we ask the questions. Unfortunately I think these are the majority of the people. If you combine all that with a shady Silicon Valley CEO under historical pressure to make OpenAI profitable after 64 billion in funding, regularly flirting with the US president, it seems always consequential to me that exactly what the author described is the goal. No matter the cost. As we all feel like AI progress is stagnating and mainly the production cost to get AI responses is going down, this almost seems like the only out for OpenAI to win.