4 ms·

> Probably not a coincidence that Covert Instruments wasn't named in the lawsuit What's the non-coincidence?

• sgerenser 1y ago
  That they avoided naming the lawyer or the lawyer's company in their bogus lawsuit and instead only named the non-lawyer.
  • jonny_eh 1y ago
    He can still defend his employee, right?
    • JonathonW 1y ago
      My understanding is that LPL is not still practicing (he says he's retired, to focus on security work), but I'd guess he knows someone, if McNally didn't already have his own lawyer.
      • MBCook 1y ago
        Even if he was practicing, if he were to take this case it would pretty obviously expose who he was. So no matter what I would expect LPL would get someone he knew/equivalent to take the case.
        • CSMastermind 1y ago
          I mean, it's not exactly a secret. If you really want to know you can look it up online. He even has a whole talk he gives about why he generally doesn't reveal his identity. People send him packages with trackers hidden in them, hire private investigators to follow him with bogus stories, etc.