4 ms·
You'd have to break most of those platforms' TOS to do so.
by breakingcups 1y ago
You'd have to break most of those platforms' TOS to do so.
- LorenDB 1y agoWas Pidgin TOS-compliant back in the day? I'm a young whippersnapper, so I don't have experience with it myself.
- taink 1y agoWell it did have to change its name from GAIM to Pidgin at some point because it infringed on "AIM" by AOL. And whether or not Pidgin was fully "TOS-compliant" (which it might have been depending on the service we'd be looking at) is not as relevant as whether these terms would have been actually legally enforceable or not.
- rw_grim 1y agoThat was due to a trademark violation and nothing to do with TOS.
- rw_grim 1y agoWe (Pidgin/Gaim/Finch/libpurple) have never been TOS compliant.
- immibis 1y agoThat's always been the case. Jailbreaking your phone is also breaking TOS. Sideloading apps on iPhone by using the developer features is breaking TOS. Almost anything that gives a corporation less money or control over you is against that corporation's TOS. That's not the law, though, and we need to grow a collective spine. ... It's a lot easier to have a spine about risking getting banned from a service if getting banned from that service wouldn't destroy your life.