3 ms·
Consider the source — the author appears to believe that trauma itself doesn’t truly exist, is not based on physical phenomena or experiences, and is largely a
by sonofhans 1y ago
Consider the source — the author appears to believe that trauma itself doesn’t truly exist, is not based on physical phenomena or experiences, and is largely a sales idea manufactured by the therapy industry.
This article, and others, are riddled with rhetorical bullshit. E.g., someone on Instagram said that their emotionally distant father caused trauma, so “emotional distance” is added into the causes of trauma, and this is used to diminish the power of “trauma” itself.
This is exactly as illuminating as a neurotypical arguing whether Tylenol or vaccines cause more Autism. The author’s only skin in the game is being provocative.
- duskdozer 1y agoYes, good to note the overlaps between anti-psychology/anti-therapy and "MAHA".
- lotsofpulp 1y agoAre the claims of lack of supporting data false? They seem pretty specific and easy to verify.
- tredre3 1y ago> This is exactly as illuminating as a neurotypical arguing whether Tylenol or vaccines cause more Autism. The author’s only skin in the game is being provocative. Are you suggesting that only people afflicted with a condition should have the right to research it and look for its causes?
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]