3 ms·
So better UX while keeping git's solid internals? Makes sense. Developers I know have been wanting that.
by jimbokun 1y ago
So better UX while keeping git's solid internals?
Makes sense. Developers I know have been wanting that.
- steveklabnik 1y agoIt's technically a bit more than that. JJ is its own VCS, with pluggable backends. Google has a closed-source Piper backend, the git backend is the only real open source backend. But at high level, it's fine to think about it in that way, yeah. I tend to think about it as being more "able to work on git repos" than as a UI.
- warwren 1y agoI can't hear Piper backend without thinking about Pied Piper
- SoftTalker 1y agoNot the only project that's working on that. https://www.gameoftrees.org/ https://www.gameoftrees.org/