4 ms·
It is already too bad that the US's plan to get to the moon was so flawed that it has been delayed again and again and money was wasted. Let's imagine that Chi
by georgeecollins 1y ago
It is already too bad that the US's plan to get to the moon was so flawed that it has been delayed again and again and money was wasted.
Let's imagine that China puts people on the moon next year in a method similar to the way the US did it in 1969 (but probably better in some ways). They still are mostly doing something that has been done before by the USA.
In that same year, the USA will probably continue to launch 80% of the rockets to space. Maybe we don't do our next trip to the moon for another five years. But there's good chance by then we will be using much more advanced and reusable rockets. Does that really make the US behind?
I want to see us invest more into space exploration. I think its sad that NASA's plan has been dumb. But getting two or three people to the moon is more about showing that China is capable (which is a very reasonable goal for them) then showing they have some long term advantage.
- testing22321 1y agoChina’s plan looks nothing like what was done in 69. They’re going to build a base there, just like the US wants to.
- cryptonector 1y agoWhat a tremendous waste of resources.
- tonyhart7 1y agowhat do you mean waste of resources????
- oskarkk 1y agoYeah, their plan is more extended than Apollo, but their initial part of the plan with which they can beat US to the moon is just like Apollo. The later parts of their plan need a rocket which doesn't exist yet (and they recently decided that it will be Starship-like). Meanwhile Starship may be delayed and be later than the first Chinese landing, but it allows to send unprecedented payload to the Moon from the start.
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]