If holding the CTO of OpenAI accountable for his wildly inaccurate statement constitutes "dunking on OpenAI", then I'd say dunk away. He, more than anyone else

If holding the CTO of OpenAI accountable for his wildly inaccurate statement constitutes "dunking on OpenAI", then I'd say dunk away. He, more than anyone else, should be able to for one parse the original statements correctly and for another maybe realize that if one of their models had accomplished what he seemed to think GPT-5 had, that may require some more scrutiny and research before posting it. That would have, after all, been a clear and incredibly massive development for the space, something the CTO of OpenAI should recognize instantly. The amount of people that told me this is clear and indisputable proof that AGI/ASI/whatever is either around the corner or already here is far more than zero and arguing against their misunderstanding was made all the more challenging because "the CTO of OpenAI knows more than you" is quite a solid appeal to authority. I'd recommend maybe a waiting period of 48h before any authority in any field can send a tweet, that might resolve some of the inaccuracies and the incredibly annoying need to just jump on wild bandwagons...