3 ms·
I thought this was surely a joke as it is a hilarious premise for a "scientific" paper not much qualifies as statistically significant from a sample size of 13
by puppycodes 1y ago
I thought this was surely a joke as it is a hilarious premise for a "scientific" paper
not much qualifies as statistically significant from a sample size of 136 men out of roughly 4 billion.
- f33d5173 1y agoThe validity of a sample size has nothing to do with the size of the set it's drawn from. 136 is a reasonable sample size, 25 is considered the minimum for a yes/no question.
- puppycodes 1y agosorry but what are talking about? This is why so many studies are impossible to replicate. The sample size has everything to do with the hypothesis here. There is no one size fits all meaningful sample size. When you make a claim about "men" writ large you need enough data to establish significance and account for the multitude of other variables at play which are massive here.