7 ms·
You didnt read a book and didnt watch 2 videos, and now have to share your take with the world. Thank you dearly.
by dmbche 1y ago
You didnt read a book and didnt watch 2 videos, and now have to share your take with the world. Thank you dearly.
- DarkmSparks 1y agoSo I did my bit Could you clarify if you are saying there was anything other than a lot of logical falicies known as https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem Or if the only criticisms of the book are logical falicies.
- dmbche 1y agoWhy would you ask me when you can watch the video itself instead of talking about it Edit0: cant reply further somehow. This isnt a debate and the only supported claims you have done are that you didnt read the book or watch the videos - your claims are moot. I recommend the feeling of grass in the palm of the hand.
- DarkmSparks 1y agoI have made the claim the only criticisms of the book are logical fallacies. (That I have found) Not 100% clear if you agree or disagree, but the way this works now, is short of any further criticism that isnt a logical fallacy, is just assume you agree with the book and have no valid criticism of it. Thanks for the recommendation, think I'll grab a copy and read it for myself. Just about to finish deaths end and was wondering what to read next.