4 ms·

Edit - this comment is incorrect --- The title should be edited. It sounds as if the test is 94% accurate at detecting long covid, but in fact it's 94% accura

Edit - this comment is incorrect --- The title should be edited. It sounds as if the test is 94% accurate at detecting long covid, but in fact it's 94% accurate at counting microclots > We estimated a 94% accuracy for the microclot count using the devices, significantly higher than the traditional counting of microclots on slides (66% accuracy)

diffeomorphism 1y ago
No, you are parsing this wrong. > We evaluated the diagnostic power (...). We estimated a 94% accuracy for (our method), significantly higher than the (traditional method) (66% accuracy). Both methods have counting in their name, but they are comparing the diagnostic power.
- ipsento606 1y ago
  after reading more - you're right, I'm wrong
  - pinkmuffinere 1y ago
    I appreciate the frank acknowledgment of your mistakes. We need more people like you.