3 ms·
sure, it's all nature. and then wonder why you get 50% of the population morbidly obese... you are being skeptical in a very silly way, sorry to say. if you do
by kome 1y ago
sure, it's all nature. and then wonder why you get 50% of the population morbidly obese...
you are being skeptical in a very silly way, sorry to say. if you don't see the industry incentives to use trash in your food instead of normal ingredients, you are missing the point in a very unproductive way.
- donatj 1y agoYours argument is coming from just a place of science denialism. Industry powers do not negate simple science. Come to me with scientific evidence and not fear mongering, and then we can talk on an equal field.
- kome 1y agoIsn't the overwhelmingly obese American population scientific evidence enough?
- monerozcash 1y agoNot really, the same ingredients are widely used in other countries which do not suffer from the same problems as Americans.
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- UncleMeat 1y agoIs it any more evidence for ultra processing being the problem than the last N food panics? Obesity was high when the story was "high fat foods are the problem" too.
- lupusreal 1y ago[dead]
- adammarples 1y agoThe population is obese because they eat too many calories and they will not stop. Arbitrarily banning foods because they are not "normal" doesn't prevent this. Butter is OK, cream is OK, sugar is OK. When sugar takes a slightly different form it's "not normal" so banning it will make everyone thin again.
- chneu 1y agoExcept a lot of evidence suggests that the foods we eat nowadays cause more weight gain than before industrialization. Two people can eat the same number of calories, but if one of them is slamming UPFs they will gain more weight. Additionally, UPFs do not satiate hunger like more natural foods. Meaning people can eat more UPFs than more natural foods before feeling full. There are absolutely industrial ingredients we should be banning in the US that other countries have rightfully banned.