Off the top of my head: Assuming there's a specific point the data needs to get to. Assuming the size of the data sphere doesn't impact the speeds of anything

Off the top of my head: Assuming there's a specific point the data needs to get to. Assuming the size of the data sphere doesn't impact the speeds of anything inside it. Assuming we're using a classical computer. Assuming the support scaffolding of the computer stays a fixed percentage of the mass and doesn't eat into the data budget. And I know some of those still fit into "at least" but if one of those would make it notably worse than sqrt(n) then I stand by my claim that it's a bad speed rating.