It isn't a review article, though the difference is more subtle, because a review article is also editorial in nature. The difference here is that this article

It isn't a review article, though the difference is more subtle, because a review article is also editorial in nature. The difference here is that this article is someone with an axe to grind (again, see the "dedication", which is never done in a legitimate review; and the clownish application of statistics, which is so completely absurd that it implies incompetence, malice or both). I have no faith that this writer made a legitimate attempt to impartially weigh the evidence on this question.