4 ms·
Really, I do not know how I missed that :) I read it a couple of times to and I still thought he wanted it the other way. So my original comment kind of stand
by jmclnx 1y ago
Really, I do not know how I missed that :) I read it a couple of times to and I still thought he wanted it the other way.
So my original comment kind of stands but in a opposite way.
I have never see file_9.txt sorted before file_10.txt, I just tested it on OpenBSD and I got this, which I have always seen:
$ ls|sort
file_1.txt
file_10.txt
file_12.txt
file_2.txt
file_20.txt
file_3.txt
file_9.txt
- sebtron 1y agoAuthor here - My surprise stems exactly from the fact that for the last few years I have exclusively managed my files via a the UNIX shell, which behaves in the classical way.
- zahlman 1y agoWhen I started using Linux as my daily driver after many years of Windows (but with familiarity with UNIX systems going way back), I knew it would be like that in the terminal, but it still took some adjustment. But actually, Nemo does the same "natural sort" thing, and also sorts case-insensitively.
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]